|
We "must" ask four questions:
Actually, no, we don't.
"Only one tribunal ever adopted a practice of forcing counsel upon an unwilling defendant in a criminal proceeding. The tribunal was the Star Chamber."-U.S. v Faretta , 422 U.S. 806 (1975)
OUTSIDE, IT'S AMERICA
REASONABLE DOUBT
DIRTY SECRETS AND MENTAL TORTURE TREATMENTS TO RESTORE YOUR MIND.
(c) 1995-2026
All Rights Reserved |

We "must" ask four questions:
The Case of 4 Questions.

ALEX AND HOWARD
We must ask four questions:
- Is the regulation with the power of the government?
- Does it promote an important or substantial government interest?
- Is that interest unrelated to suppressing free expression?
- And, finally, is the [incidental] restriction on First Amendment freedoms no greater than necessary?
See O'Brien, 391 U.S. at 377; Jones Intercable, Inc. v. City of Chula Vista, 80 F.3d 320, 325 (9th Cir. 1996).
SEE ALSO FIRST AMENDMENT.
SEE ALSO THE CENSORSHIP OF KILLERCOP.COM
SEE ALSO THE CENSORSHIP OF KILLERCOP.COM, PART TWO.
CONTACT THE AUTHOR AND OWNER.
Suspicion that viewpoint discrimination is afoot is at its zenith when the speech restricted is speech critical of the government," Ridley v. Mass. Bay Transp. Auth., 390 F.3d 65, 86 (1st Cir. 2004)
COLLECT A BOUNTY
COLLECT A REWARD
KILLER MERCH
FILE A COMPLAINT

TO PURCHASE KILLERCOP.COM™ EMAIL SALES @ KILLERCOP.COM
(c) 1995-2026
All Rights Reserved
|  |